With trade wars and slowing global economies, it may be a bad time to be an international brand

Canada Goose brand parkas in a store in New York.

Noam Galai | WireImage | Getty Images
Canada Goose brand parkas in a store in New York.

Amid a lack of tangible progress in trade talks between the U.S. and China, growing tensions around the world, as well as slowing economies, some on Wall Street are sounding the alarm that major international brands could soon fall out of favor.

And signs are mounting that Canada Goose, the Toronto-based maker of luxury outdoor apparel, could be one of the first to suffer.

The company’s stock was downgraded on Thursday to “market perform” from “outperform” at Wells Fargo, which cited valuation concerns, recent weak consumer engagement trends, and significant pressures facing multi-national brands. Wells Fargo also lowered its price target on the stock from $80 to $68.

“The recent performance of multi-national brands has been lackluster over the past several months, leading to revisions across the space,” Wells Fargo senior analyst Ike Boruchow wrote in a note to clients. “We believe the primary drivers for this weakness include…tourism going from good to bad, Europe becoming very problematic, and fears around an eventual slowdown in China.”

Shares of Canada Goose fell more than 7 percent on Thursday, the stock’s worst day of trading in more than a month. The parka maker’s stock has plunged more than 20 percent from its recent high in mid-November.

Wells Fargo added that slowdowns in Google searches and Instagram engagement over the holiday season have sparked further concerns that customers could be pulling back. Since the company’s IPO in early 2017, Google search trends for “Canada Goose” had been increasing at a double-digit rate each quarter but started to decelerate both in Canada and globally late last year.

“[This is] somewhat concerning for a stock that currently relies

heavily on momentum and robust growth to keep their premium valuation justified,” Boruchow said in the note. “December is the peak holiday month and the most likely time of year consumers would search for the brand on Google when shopping.”

Despite the headwinds, Wells Fargo noted that Canada Goose’s stock trades at a premium to a cohort of global luxury retailers like Burberry, Ferragamo, Moncler, Prada and Tiffany’s. And, shares are still trading more than 160 percent above the IPO price.

To compete with other international brands, Canada Goose has been aggressively pushing into China, where the population accounts for one-third of the world’s luxury consumption, according to analyst estimates. The company debuted highly anticipated locations in Hong Kong and Beijing last year, which will compete with local stores featuring knockoff brands.

But the apparel maker’s push into China has faced challenges. Canada Goose came under pressure last month as economic and political tensions escalated between China and Western countries. In early December, Canada arrested Meng Wanzhou, the chief financial officer of Chinese tech giant Huawei. Over the following week, Canada Goose’s stock dropped 17 percent after reports surfaced that Chinese consumers were boycotting the brand.

Wells Fargo joins a chorus of business leaders that have warned these ongoing geopolitical tensions could hurt notable North American brands.

In early November, Procter & Gamble CEO David Taylor told CNBC that he was especially concerned about the long-term damage the trade war could have on consumer behavior and spending.

“What I worry most about with the trade war is it destroys consumers’ confidence in American brands,” Taylor said at the time.

In its latest earnings report on Thursday, Starbucks said that stores in China operating for at least one year increased sales by 1 percent this past quarter. But the coffee giant saw transactions there drop by 2 percent, and some analysts worry the company could see a further slowdown if trade disputes aren’t resolved quickly.

The U.S. has set a March 2 deadline for negotiators to reach a deal; if no deal is reached, tariffs are set to increase on $200 billion in Chinese goods.

Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said earlier on Thursday that China and the U.S. were not close to striking a trade deal. Ross told CNBC’s “Squawk Box ” that the U.S. is “miles and miles ” from a trade deal with China, noting the two countries have “lots and lots of issues.”